The Brain as Hologram

It isn`t that the world of appearance is wrong; it isn`t that there aren`t objects out there, at one level of reality, It`s that if you penetrate through and look at the universe with a holographic system, you arrive at a different view, a different realitym and that other reality can explain things that have hitherto remained inexplicable scientifically: paranormal phenomena, synchronicities, the apparently meaningful coincidence of events -- Karl Pribram in an interview in Psychology Today

The puzzle that first started Pribram on the road to formulating his holographicmodel was the question of how and where memories are stored in the brain. Each memory a person had, such as the memory of the fragrance of a gardenia you sniffed when you were sixteen, was believed to have a specific location somewhere in the brain cells. Such memory traces were called engrams, and although no one knew what an engram was made of -- wether it was a neuron or perhaps even a special kind of molecule -- most scientists were confident it was only a matter of time before one would be found.

There were reasons for this confidence. Research conducted by Canadian neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield in the 1920s had offered convincing evidence that specific memories did have specific lications in the brain. One of the most unusual features of the brain is that the object itself doesn`t sense pain directly. As long as the scalp and skull have been deadened with a local anethetic, surgery can be performed on the brain of a fully concious person without causing any pain.

In a series of landmark experiments, Penfield used this fact to his advantage. While operating on the brains of epileptics, he would electrically stimulate various areas of their brain cells. To his amazement he found that when he stimulated the temporal lobes (the region of the brain behind the temples) of one of his fully conscious patients, they reexperienced memories of past episodes from their lives in vivid detail. One man suddenly relived a conversation he had had with friends in South Africa: a boy heard his mother talking on the telephone and after several touches from Penfield`s electrode was able to repeat her entire conversation; a woman found herself in her kitchen and could hear her son playing outside. Even when Penfield tried to mislead his patients by telling them he was stimulating a different area when he was not, he found that when he touched the same spot it always evoked the same memory.

In his book "The Mystery of the Mind" published in 1975, just shortly before his death, he wrote, "It was evident at once that these were not dreams. They were electrical activations of the sequential record of consciousness, a record that had been laid down during the patient`s earlier experience. The patient "re-lived" all that he had been aware of in that earlier period of time as in a moving-picture `flashback`"

From his research Penfield concluded that everything we have ever experienced is recorded in our brain, from every stranger`s face we have glanced at in crowd to every spider web we gazed at as a child. He reasoned that this was why memories of so many insugnificant events kept cropping up in his sampling. If our memory is a complete record of even the most mundane of our day-to-day experiences, it is chronicle would produce a good deal of trifling information.

As a young neurosurgery resident, Pribram had no reason to doubt Penfield`s enrgram theory. But then something happened that was to change his thinking forever. In 1946 he went to work with the great neuropsychologist Karl Lashley at the Yerkes Laboratory of Primate Biology, then in Orange Park, Florida. For over thirty years Lashley had been involved in his own ongoing search for the elusive mechanisms responsible for memory, and there Pribram was able to witness the fruits of Lashley`s labors firsthand. What was startling was that not only had Lashley failed to produce any evidence of the engram, but his research actually seemd to pull the rug out from under all of Penfield`s finding.

What Lashley had done was to train rats to perform a variety of tasks, such as run a maze. Then he surgically removed various portions of their brains and retested them. His aim was literally to cut out the area of the rats` brains containing the memory of their maze-running ability. To his surprise he found that no matter what portion of their brains he cut out, he couldn`t eradicate their memories, Often the rats` motor skills were impaied and they stumbled clumsily through the mazes, but even with massive portions of their brains removed, their memories remained stubbornly intact.

For Pribram these were incredible findings. If memories possessed specific locations in the brain in the same way that books possess specific locations on library shelves, why didn`t Lashley`s surgical plunderings have any effect on them? For Pribram the only answer seemed to be that memories were not localized at specific brain sites, but were somehow spread out or distributed  throughout the brain as a whole. The problem was that he knew of no mechanism or process that could account for such a state of affairs.

Lashley was even less certain and later wrote, "I sometimes feel, in reviewing the evidence on the localiztion of the memory trace, that the necessary conclusion is that learning just is not possible at all Nevertheless, in spite of such evidence against it, learning does sometimes occur." In 1948 Pribram was offered a position at Yale, and before leaving he helped write up thirty years of Lashley`s monumental research.


From: The Holographic Universe: The Revolutionary Theory of Reality

Read more>>